Well, let's leave Sister Midnight for now. I'm looking again at the banner ads google matches to my content, and they are often worthy of comment. I've noticed that any time I mention alcoholism I get ads that promote various not-drinking programs that seem to be targeted at an anti-spiritual approach. The Seinfeld approach. Remember that TV program? The characters were entirely without conscience, without a sense that there might be sin or redemption, or any one thing beyond the fulfillment of their immediate needs. Perhaps that's why I didn't enjoy Lost Highway but I loved Blue Velvet and Wild At Heart.
A friend of mine monitors The White Lodge from time to time, without commenting. She told me it's like Michael Savage meets Timothy Leary. I've done some hard living, sure. I'm at peace with that. So, Dennis Hopper can say "fuck" a million times in a movie and get high on nitrous whenever he's about to kill somebody, and I'm OK with that. The violence and shocking depravity of his character in Blue Velvet illustrates villainy. That villainy is real. There are people like that.
I like Abel Ferrara pictures, many of them. King of New York with Christopher Walken. But especially Bad Lieutenant with that stand-up knock-down performance by Harvey Keitel. Why is it we have to see his private parts in every movie he makes? Why is it we have to see anybody's?
Yes, I'm a traditionalist but I'm not a prude. I like stories about Good v. Evil. I like stories that affirm there is such a thing as that eternal battle because there is such a thing as that eternal battle. People are complicated. People are often sick, often oppressed or possessed by demons of all varieties.
Look at the "string of pearls" - look at The Gospel According to Mark, what happens there. Events in the ministry life of Jesus are told in this rapid, matter-of-fact, almost artless manner, one right after the other. Historians suggest that Mark was in a hurry because he was in Rome and he was in hiding, being hunted. Luke would take Mark's gospel and re-write it a little more artfully. But just look at all the demons Jesus encounters in the course of that narrative. I mean, you would think...
So, where are those demons today? Was there something about Jesus that He attracted them? Well, maybe - yes. Mark tells us these demons knew of His divine nature. They were trying to "out" Him, in a sense - blow His cover. But more to the point, what did Mark mean by his descriptions of demons? Are they demanding we believe in servants of a devil with pointy tails, or are they merely personifying aspects of the evil that often possesses us?
Well, I think both interpretations are true. Look, I've seen some things, and I've sensed much that remained unseen. But what have I told you about movies that feature talking animals? Disney movies? Looney Tunes? What are talking animals? Well, talking animals are demons - plain and simple. Those stories that feature talking animals are not about talking animals; they are about people. Animals are personified, or demonized - two words that mean exactly the same thing in their root definitions - in order to illustrate in an entertaining way something about the human condition. Not the talking animal condition, but the human condition.
How do we know this? Well, animals don't talk. Duh.
The word demon means person. But we reserve use of the word demon to mean person who isn't human. Could be a half-human, perhaps. Or a creature with the appearance of humanity, a disguise. We often personify - or, assign traits of human personality and consciousness to abstract principles, to thoughts, to feelings (which are really just a kind of thought). We may do this with addictions, like a drug addiction. And we may do this with alcoholism. (Two very different things, by the way.) We call those bad ideas, those wrong ideas, those sinful ideas that sometimes inhabit our minds 'demons.'
When somebody enters treatment for an addiction don't we say something like, "It's so good to see so-and-so is trying to face down his demons?" We may mean it in a poetic way, but what other way is there? Goodness gracious - isn't everything we say and think meaningful? Why else say it? Why else think it? Some people - Charismatics, Pentecostals, Catholics - say these demons are 'beings' of a sort, hideous half-made mock imitations of the worst that we can be.
Others like to think of it in a psychological way. And who has witnessed deliverance prayer who hasn't witnessed a form of psycho-drama? Are we wrong to perform liberating psycho-drama - the same sort of thing that's done by secular psychologists - in the Presence of God? Frankly, I've seen more effective results from the prayer than I have from the looney bin, but you may say that is just my anecdotal evidence, and you would be right if you did. But, do you get the point?
It doesn't matter one bit whether you wish to think of demons in the way of the religious person or in the way of the secular person. There are demons. They can oppress us. They can possess us. Oppression is very common. Actual possession is relatively rare. Much of the time in Mark's gospel he was referring not to the latter but to the former, even though both states are called "possession."
In other words, those people in Mark are just ordinary people possessed or oppressed by the exact same demons we know today. Let the meaningless argument rage on between warring factions of literalist and symbolist interpretations - Who gives a flying monkey's ass? What does the story mean?
See, that's what I'm looking for when I read a story, watch a movie. There has to be truth in it. I believe in knights and dragons. I believe in redemption. I know it's possible. I know it happens. My Redeemer lives. He's not a ghost, not "a great spiritual teacher," nor a feeling . I like to be challenged. Sometimes I like to be shocked. I like it when there's a real bad guy, and the good guy wins. Soldiers aren't victims, but heroes. Truth is not hidden, but right in front of your face. Sacrifice is the meaning of life; there is no other meanigful thing a person can do. These principles, when they appear in stories, will usually get me liking the story.
So, anytime I see these banner ads that are just "anti" rather than "pro," reaction rather than action; limitation rather than infinity - I think: Sho'now, the demons haven't changed a bit, have they? Still selling that snake oil. The Seinfeld Method. They promise to teach us how to embrace our demons, rather than kill them, I suppose.
How tiny is the mind that cannot appreciate anything beyond what seems to exist by touch and taste alone?